[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55E4BED1.7050201@avagotech.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:53:37 -0400
From: James Smart <james.smart@...gotech.com>
To: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...gotech.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Fix possible use-after-free and double free in
lpfc_mbx_cmpl_rdp_page_a2()
On 8/18/2015 6:27 PM, Sebastian Herbszt wrote:
> Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de> writes:
>>
>>> Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>>>> If the bf_get() call in lpfc_mbx_cmpl_rdp_page_a2() does succeeds, execution
>>>> continues normally and mp gets kfree()d.
>>>>
>>>> If the subsequent call to lpfc_sli_issue_mbox() fails execution jumps to the
>>>> error label where lpfc_mbuf_free() is called with mp->virt and mp->phys as
>>>> function arguments. This is the use after free. Following the use after free mp
>>>> gets kfree()d again which is a double free.
>>> A similar patch was posted by Colin Ian King on 2015-07-31 [1].
>>>
>>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=143835937206204&w=2
>> OK,
>>
>> Is it already in James' tree (haven't checked)? The problematic code was
>> merged for 4.2-rc1 so if the fix (Collin's or mine I don't care) could go
>> in while we're still in the rc phase, we could avoid all that stable
>> circus.
>>
>> Thanks for digging this out.
>>
>> Byte,
>> Johannes
> It is not yet in scsi.git.
>
> James S., Dick, which patch do you prefer?
>
> Sebastian
I looked at both and liked Johannes patch better.
-- james s
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists