[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150819002751.00000f06@localhost>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:27:51 +0200
From: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
James Smart <james.smart@...gotech.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...gotech.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lpfc: Fix possible use-after-free and double free in
lpfc_mbx_cmpl_rdp_page_a2()
Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de> writes:
>
> > Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> >> If the bf_get() call in lpfc_mbx_cmpl_rdp_page_a2() does succeeds, execution
> >> continues normally and mp gets kfree()d.
> >>
> >> If the subsequent call to lpfc_sli_issue_mbox() fails execution jumps to the
> >> error label where lpfc_mbuf_free() is called with mp->virt and mp->phys as
> >> function arguments. This is the use after free. Following the use after free mp
> >> gets kfree()d again which is a double free.
> >
> > A similar patch was posted by Colin Ian King on 2015-07-31 [1].
> >
> > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=143835937206204&w=2
>
> OK,
>
> Is it already in James' tree (haven't checked)? The problematic code was
> merged for 4.2-rc1 so if the fix (Collin's or mine I don't care) could go
> in while we're still in the rc phase, we could avoid all that stable
> circus.
>
> Thanks for digging this out.
>
> Byte,
> Johannes
It is not yet in scsi.git.
James S., Dick, which patch do you prefer?
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists