linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] RAS changes for v4.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2015 08:50:39 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RAS changes for v4.3

On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:33:01PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/ras/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/ras/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,2 +1,35 @@
> > -config RAS
> > -       bool
> > +menuconfig RAS
> > +       bool "Reliability, Availability and Serviceability (RAS) features"
> 
> Do you think it would make sense to add
> 
>         depends on X86 || COMPILE_TEST
> 
> to hide the option on unsupported systems?

Either that or maybe have X86 select CONFIG_RAS...?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/