[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150902065028.GP16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 08:50:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] clocksource: Improve unstable clocksource detection
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:35:18PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:14:17 -0700
> Shaohua Li <shli@...com> wrote:
>
> > > You think that blocking softirq execution for 42.9 seconds is normal?
> > > Seems we are living in a different universe.
> >
> > I don't say it's normal. I say it's not hard to trigger.
> >
> > > > it's just VM off. A softirq can hog the cpu.
> > >
>
> Please provide a test case that shows the softirq hogging the cpu for
> over 40 seconds.
Do not overlook the MAX_SOFTIRQ_* logic while you're there trying to
explain this ;-)
A softirq running significantly longer than 2 jiffies and not falling
back to ksoftirq is a plain bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists