lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:56:09 +0200
From:	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:	Ranjit Abhimanyu Waghmode <ranjit.waghmode@...inx.com>
Cc:	"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
	Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
	"zajec5@...il.com" <zajec5@...il.com>,
	"ben@...adent.org.uk" <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	"b32955@...escale.com" <b32955@...escale.com>,
	"knut.wohlrab@...bosch.com" <knut.wohlrab@...bosch.com>,
	"juhosg@...nwrt.org" <juhosg@...nwrt.org>,
	"beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>,
	Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaia@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [LINUX RFC v2 0/4] spi: add dual parallel mode support in Zynq MPSoC GQSPI controller

On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 at 07:12:14 PM, Ranjit Abhimanyu Waghmode 
wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex@...x.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:26 PM
> > To: Ranjit Abhimanyu Waghmode
> > Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org; computersforpeace@...il.com;
> > broonie@...nel.org; Michal Simek; Soren Brinkmann; zajec5@...il.com;
> > ben@...adent.org.uk; b32955@...escale.com; knut.wohlrab@...bosch.com;
> > juhosg@...nwrt.org; beanhuo@...ron.com; linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-spi@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Harini Katakam; Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
> > Subject: Re: [LINUX RFC v2 0/4] spi: add dual parallel mode support in
> > Zynq MPSoC GQSPI controller
> > 
> > On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 08:26:03 AM, Ranjit Waghmode wrote:
> > > This series adds dual parallel mode support for Zynq Ultrascale+ MPSoC
> > > GQSPI controller driver.
> > > 
> > > What is dual parallel mode?
> > > ---------------------------
> > > ZynqMP GQSPI controller supports Dual Parallel mode with following
> > > functionalities: 1) Supporting two SPI flash memories operating in
> > > parallel. 8 I/O lines. 2) Chip selects and clock are shared to both
> > > the flash devices
> > > 3) This mode is targeted for faster read/write speed and also doubles
> > > the size 4) Commands/data can be transmitted/received from both the
> > > devices(mirror), or only upper or only lower flash memory devices.
> > > 
> > > 5) Data arrangement:
> > >    With stripe enabled,
> > >    Even bytes i.e. 0, 2, 4,... are transmitted on Lower Data Bus
> > >    Odd bytes i.e. 1, 3, 5,.. are transmitted on Upper Data Bus.
> > 
> > This might be a dumb question, but why don't you just treat this as an
> > SPI NOR flash with 8-bit bus ?
> 
> In case of dual parallel configuration of this controller there are
> different modes like single, dual and quad mode. Whatever you are
> suggesting would fit only in the case of Quad mode operation as both buses
> would have 4 lines each. In case of single mode of parallel configuration,
> there would be two buses; but the line on each bus would one. So
> altogether there will be two lines. And in case of dual mode of parallel
> configuration each bus will be having two lines. So altogether 4 lines
> will be there. So keeping 8 lines would not support above two modes of
> parallel configuration correctly.
> 
> Logically it is a single flash with 8 IO lines but physically it's a two
> flash devices and each has 4 IO lines. So, in this case, read and write
> addresses should be always even and minimum data that can be accessed is 2
> bytes.

Oh, I see what the issue is now. It has to do with configuring the flash
into correct bus-width mode, right ?

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ