lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55ED29B3.3040805@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 07 Sep 2015 14:07:47 +0800
From:	Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>
To:	Julien Grall <julien.grall@...rix.com>
CC:	Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-blkback: free requests on disconnection

Hi Julien,

On 09/04/2015 09:51 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Roger,
> 
> On 04/09/15 11:08, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> Request allocation has been moved to connect_ring, which is called every
>> time blkback connects to the frontend (this can happen multiple times during
>> a blkback instance life cycle). On the other hand, request freeing has not
>> been moved, so it's only called when destroying the backend instance. Due to
>> this mismatch, blkback can allocate the request pool multiple times, without
>> freeing it.
>>
>> In order to fix it, move the freeing of requests to xen_blkif_disconnect to
>> restore the symmetry between request allocation and freeing.
>>
>> Reported-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...rix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
>> Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...rix.com>
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
>> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
>> Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
>> Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
> 
> The patch is fixing my problem when using UEFI in the guest. Thank you!
> 

Could you please explain the problem you met a bit more?
So that I can know back port this patch if met similar issue.

Thanks,
-Bob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ