[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150908122606.GH3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 14:26:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"yuyang.du@...el.com" <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
"sgurrappadi@...dia.com" <sgurrappadi@...dia.com>,
"pang.xunlei@....com.cn" <pang.xunlei@....com.cn>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by
capacity_orig
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:22:05AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> No, but
> sa->util_avg = (sa->util_sum << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT) / LOAD_AVG_MAX;
> will fix the unit issue.
Tricky that, LOAD_AVG_MAX very much relies on the unit being 1<<10.
And where load_sum already gets a factor 1024 from the weight
multiplication, util_sum does not get such a factor, and all the scaling
we do on it loose bits.
So at the moment we go compute the util_avg value, we need to inflate
util_sum with an extra factor 1024 in order to make it work.
And seeing that we do the shift up on sa->util_sum without consideration
of overflow, would it not make sense to add that factor before the
scaling and into the addition?
Now, given all that, units are a complete mess here, and I'd not mind
something like:
#if (SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT - SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION) != SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT
#error "something usefull"
#endif
somewhere near here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists