[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55EED8E6.8090706@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:47:34 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"yuyang.du@...el.com" <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
"sgurrappadi@...dia.com" <sgurrappadi@...dia.com>,
"pang.xunlei@....com.cn" <pang.xunlei@....com.cn>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by
capacity_orig
On 07/09/15 20:47, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 07:54:18PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> I would vote for removing this SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION thing completely so that we can
>> assume that load/util and capacity are always using 1024/10.
>
> Ha!, I just requested Google look into moving it to 20 again ;-)
>
In this case Steve and Vincent have a point here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists