linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mfd: update Intel soc PMIC header file to support Broxton WC PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150911092235.GJ3260@x1>
Date:	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:22:35 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	"Zha, Qipeng" <qipeng.zha@...el.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mfd: update Intel soc PMIC header file to support
 Broxton WC PMIC

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Zha, Qipeng wrote:

> >>  
> >> +#define INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(_irq, _off, _mask)		\
> >> +	[_irq] = { .reg_offset = (_off), .mask = (_mask) }
> >> +
> 
> >No, that's not what I asked.
> 
> >Either this macro is going to be useful to *everyone*, or it's probably not useful to *anyone*.  If it's going to exist, it should exist in the core header file, not Intel's own.
> 
> Jones, can we keep current change as for intel's own ?  not sure if Mark agree to merge this macro to core regmap header file.
> Maybe some driver want to initialize regmap_irq structure with different/customed way.
> Thanks.

Is that what Mark said when you submitted this to him?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/