[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1509120910090.1626@ja.home.ssi.bg>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:20:21 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
cc: wensong@...ux-vs.org, horms@...ge.net.au, pablo@...filter.org,
kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs:Fix locking requirements in the function
ip_vs_unlink_service
Hello,
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This fixes locking requirements in the function ip_vs_unlink_service
> to properly use bottom half spinlocking around the call to the function
> __ip_vs_del_service in order to meet the locking that this paricular
> function requires as stated in it's comments related to locking.
> + spin_lock_bh(&svc->sched_lock);
> __ip_vs_del_service(svc, cleanup);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&svc->sched_lock);
BH locking is not needed anymore. Also, sched_lock is
used by schedulers to protect only access to svc->sched_data
fields.
It seems the comment is outdated after
commit ceec4c381681 ("ipvs: convert services to rcu").
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists