[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150913225650.GR26895@dastard>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:56:50 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs-writeback: drop wb->list_lock during blk_finish_plug()
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 09:12:44AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 07:46:32PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > I don't think the XFS numbers can be trusted too much since it was
> > basically bottlenecked behind that single pegged CPU. It was bouncing
> > around and I couldn't quite track it down to a process name (or perf
> > profile).
>
> I'll do more runs Monday, but I was able to grab a perf profile of the
> pegged XFS CPU. It was just the writeback worker thread, and it
> hit btrfs differently because we defer more of this stuff to endio
> workers, effectively spreading it out over more CPUs.
>
> With 4 mount points intead of 2, XFS goes from 140K files/sec to 250K.
> Here's one of the profiles, but it bounced around a lot so I wouldn't
> use this to actually tune anything:
mkfs.xfs -d agcount=64 ....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists