[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55F77FB6.7020806@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:47:26 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
anton@...ba.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
grant.likely@...aro.org, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
vdavydov@...allels.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm: Replace nr_node_ids for loop with for_each_node
in list lru
On 09/15/2015 07:38 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> The functions used in the patch are in slowpath, which gets called
> whenever alloc_super is called during mounts.
>
> Though this should not make difference for the architectures with
> sequential numa node ids, for the powerpc which can potentially have
> sparse node ids (for e.g., 4 node system having numa ids, 0,1,16,17
> is common), this patch saves some unnecessary allocations for
> non existing numa nodes.
>
> Even without that saving, perhaps patch makes code more readable.
>
> [ Take memcg_aware check outside for_each loop: Vladimir]
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
Sorry that I had misspelled Vladimir above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists