[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150915075924.GD16220@esperanza>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:59:24 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <paulus@...ba.org>,
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, <anton@...ba.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
<nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm: Replace nr_node_ids for loop with
for_each_node in list lru
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:38:36AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> The functions used in the patch are in slowpath, which gets called
> whenever alloc_super is called during mounts.
>
> Though this should not make difference for the architectures with
> sequential numa node ids, for the powerpc which can potentially have
> sparse node ids (for e.g., 4 node system having numa ids, 0,1,16,17
> is common), this patch saves some unnecessary allocations for
> non existing numa nodes.
>
> Even without that saving, perhaps patch makes code more readable.
>
> [ Take memcg_aware check outside for_each loop: Vldimir]
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists