[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1442899743.18408.5.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:29:03 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, anton@...ba.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, grant.likely@...aro.org,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vdavydov@...allels.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc:numa Do not allocate bootmem memory for
non existing nodes
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 07:38 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>
> ... nothing
Sure this patch looks obvious, but please give me a changelog that proves
you've thought about it thoroughly.
For example is it OK to use for_each_node() at this point in boot? Is there any
historical reason why we did it with a hard coded loop? If so what has changed.
What systems have you tested on? etc. etc.
cheers
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> index 8b9502a..8d8a541 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
> setup_nr_node_ids();
>
> /* allocate the map */
> - for (node = 0; node < nr_node_ids; node++)
> + for_each_node(node)
> alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
>
> /* cpumask_of_node() will now work */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists