linux-kernel - [PATCH 02/26] x86, pkeys: Add Kconfig option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150916174904.996E5E23@viggo.jf.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:49:04 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	dave@...1.net
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/26] x86, pkeys: Add Kconfig option


I don't have a strong opinion on whether we need a Kconfig prompt
or not.  Protection Keys has relatively little code associated
with it, and it is not a heavyweight feature to keep enabled.
However, I can imagine that folks would still appreciate being
able to disable it.

We will hide the prompt for now.

---

 b/arch/x86/Kconfig |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff -puN arch/x86/Kconfig~pkeys-01-kconfig arch/x86/Kconfig
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig~pkeys-01-kconfig	2015-09-16 10:48:12.006999694 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig	2015-09-16 10:48:12.010999875 -0700
@@ -1694,6 +1694,10 @@ config X86_INTEL_MPX
 
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
+config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
+	def_bool y
+	depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL && X86_64
+
 config EFI
 	bool "EFI runtime service support"
 	depends on ACPI
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/