linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: lpc_ich: Separate device cells for clarity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1442506679.8361.85.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:17:59 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: lpc_ich: Separate device cells for clarity

On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 14:14 -0500, Aaron Sierra wrote:
> The lpc_ich_cells array gives the wrong impression about the
> relationship between the watchdog and GPIO devices. They are
> completely distinct devices, so this patch separates the
> array into distinct mfd_cell structs per device.
> 
> A side effect of removing the array, is that the lpc_cells enum
> is no longer needed.
> 

Looks good for me.

> Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> -
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c b/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> index 8de3439..7a01d430 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> @@ -131,24 +131,18 @@ static struct resource gpio_ich_res[] = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> -enum lpc_cells {
> -	LPC_WDT = 0,
> -	LPC_GPIO,
> +static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_wdt_cell = {
> +	.name = "iTCO_wdt",
> +	.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_ich_res),
> +	.resources = wdt_ich_res,
> +	.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
>  };
>  
> -static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_cells[] = {
> -	[LPC_WDT] = {
> -		.name = "iTCO_wdt",
> -		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_ich_res),
> -		.resources = wdt_ich_res,
> -		.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> -	},
> -	[LPC_GPIO] = {
> -		.name = "gpio_ich",
> -		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_ich_res),
> -		.resources = gpio_ich_res,
> -		.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> -	},
> +static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_gpio_cell = {
> +	.name = "gpio_ich",
> +	.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_ich_res),
> +	.resources = gpio_ich_res,
> +	.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
>  };
>  
>  /* chipset related info */
> @@ -881,7 +875,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_gpio(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	base_addr = base_addr_cfg & 0x0000ff80;
>  	if (!base_addr) {
>  		dev_notice(&dev->dev, "I/O space for ACPI 
> uninitialized\n");
> -		lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].num_resources--;
> +		lpc_ich_gpio_cell.num_resources--;
>  		goto gpe0_done;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -895,7 +889,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_gpio(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  		 * the platform_device subsystem doesn't see this 
> resource
>  		 * or it will register an invalid region.
>  		 */
> -		lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].num_resources--;
> +		lpc_ich_gpio_cell.num_resources--;
>  		acpi_conflict = true;
>  	} else {
>  		lpc_ich_enable_acpi_space(dev);
> @@ -933,14 +927,14 @@ gpe0_done:
>  	lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].use_gpio = ret;
>  	lpc_ich_enable_gpio_space(dev);
>  
> -	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO]);
> +	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_gpio_cell);
>  	ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> -			      &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO], 1, NULL, 0, 
> NULL);
> +			      &lpc_ich_gpio_cell, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
>  
>  gpio_done:
>  	if (acpi_conflict)
>  		pr_warn("Resource conflict(s) found affecting %s\n",
> -				lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].name);
> +				lpc_ich_gpio_cell.name);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -984,7 +978,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	 */
>  	if (lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].iTCO_version == 1) {
>  		/* Don't register iomem for TCO ver 1 */
> -		lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT].num_resources--;
> +		lpc_ich_wdt_cell.num_resources--;
>  	} else if (lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].iTCO_version == 
> 2) {
>  		pci_read_config_dword(dev, RCBABASE, 
> &base_addr_cfg);
>  		base_addr = base_addr_cfg & 0xffffc000;
> @@ -1007,9 +1001,9 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev 
> *dev)
>  		res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_PMC_END;
>  	}
>  
> -	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT]);
> +	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_wdt_cell);
>  	ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> -			      &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT], 1, NULL, 0, 
> NULL);
> +			      &lpc_ich_wdt_cell, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
>  
>  wdt_done:
>  	return ret;

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/