| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150919101329.GM3218@x1>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:13:29 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: lpc_ich: Separate device cells for clarity
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 14:14 -0500, Aaron Sierra wrote:
> > The lpc_ich_cells array gives the wrong impression about the
> > relationship between the watchdog and GPIO devices. They are
> > completely distinct devices, so this patch separates the
> > array into distinct mfd_cell structs per device.
> >
> > A side effect of removing the array, is that the lpc_cells enum
> > is no longer needed.
> >
>
> Looks good for me.
Is that an Ack? If so, can you formally provide one please?
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > -
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c b/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> > index 8de3439..7a01d430 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> > @@ -131,24 +131,18 @@ static struct resource gpio_ich_res[] = {
> > },
> > };
> >
> > -enum lpc_cells {
> > - LPC_WDT = 0,
> > - LPC_GPIO,
> > +static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_wdt_cell = {
> > + .name = "iTCO_wdt",
> > + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_ich_res),
> > + .resources = wdt_ich_res,
> > + .ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> > };
> >
> > -static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_cells[] = {
> > - [LPC_WDT] = {
> > - .name = "iTCO_wdt",
> > - .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_ich_res),
> > - .resources = wdt_ich_res,
> > - .ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> > - },
> > - [LPC_GPIO] = {
> > - .name = "gpio_ich",
> > - .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_ich_res),
> > - .resources = gpio_ich_res,
> > - .ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> > - },
> > +static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_gpio_cell = {
> > + .name = "gpio_ich",
> > + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_ich_res),
> > + .resources = gpio_ich_res,
> > + .ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> > };
> >
> > /* chipset related info */
> > @@ -881,7 +875,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_gpio(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > base_addr = base_addr_cfg & 0x0000ff80;
> > if (!base_addr) {
> > dev_notice(&dev->dev, "I/O space for ACPI
> > uninitialized\n");
> > - lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].num_resources--;
> > + lpc_ich_gpio_cell.num_resources--;
> > goto gpe0_done;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -895,7 +889,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_gpio(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > * the platform_device subsystem doesn't see this
> > resource
> > * or it will register an invalid region.
> > */
> > - lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].num_resources--;
> > + lpc_ich_gpio_cell.num_resources--;
> > acpi_conflict = true;
> > } else {
> > lpc_ich_enable_acpi_space(dev);
> > @@ -933,14 +927,14 @@ gpe0_done:
> > lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].use_gpio = ret;
> > lpc_ich_enable_gpio_space(dev);
> >
> > - lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO]);
> > + lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_gpio_cell);
> > ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > - &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO], 1, NULL, 0,
> > NULL);
> > + &lpc_ich_gpio_cell, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> >
> > gpio_done:
> > if (acpi_conflict)
> > pr_warn("Resource conflict(s) found affecting %s\n",
> > - lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].name);
> > + lpc_ich_gpio_cell.name);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -984,7 +978,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > */
> > if (lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].iTCO_version == 1) {
> > /* Don't register iomem for TCO ver 1 */
> > - lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT].num_resources--;
> > + lpc_ich_wdt_cell.num_resources--;
> > } else if (lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].iTCO_version ==
> > 2) {
> > pci_read_config_dword(dev, RCBABASE,
> > &base_addr_cfg);
> > base_addr = base_addr_cfg & 0xffffc000;
> > @@ -1007,9 +1001,9 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev
> > *dev)
> > res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_PMC_END;
> > }
> >
> > - lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT]);
> > + lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_wdt_cell);
> > ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > - &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT], 1, NULL, 0,
> > NULL);
> > + &lpc_ich_wdt_cell, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> >
> > wdt_done:
> > return ret;
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists