linux-kernel - Applied "regulator: core: Correct return value check in regulator_resolve

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1ZcdEE-0007MO-LV@finisterre>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:44:14 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: core: Correct return value check in regulator_resolve_supply" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: core: Correct return value check in regulator_resolve_supply

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 23c3f310e897837aeb8ffe8700b803cb58e7b35d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 14:50:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Correct return value check in
 regulator_resolve_supply

The ret pointer passed to regulator_dev_lookup is only filled with a
valid error code if regulator_dev_lookup returned NULL. Currently
regulator_resolve_supply checks this ret value before it checks if a
regulator was returned, this can result in valid regulator lookups being
ignored.

Fixes: 6261b06de565 ("regulator: Defer lookup of supply to regulator_get")
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 7150ff6..d0fbaea 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1394,15 +1394,15 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 		return 0;

 	r = regulator_dev_lookup(dev, rdev->supply_name, &ret);
-	if (ret == -ENODEV) {
-		/*
-		 * No supply was specified for this regulator and
-		 * there will never be one.
-		 */
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	if (!r) {
+		if (ret == -ENODEV) {
+			/*
+			 * No supply was specified for this regulator and
+			 * there will never be one.
+			 */
+			return 0;
+		}
+
 		if (have_full_constraints()) {
 			r = dummy_regulator_rdev;
 		} else {
-- 
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/