[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvyMNtrtk5KBQhWbPLiqG6LqqfnAJHG0rfhFfWfJFDfeng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:47:04 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To: Drew DeVault <sir@...wn.com>
Cc: Ortwin Glück <odi@....ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Failover root devices
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Drew DeVault <sir@...wn.com> wrote:
> On 2015-09-17 1:40 PM, Ortwin Glück wrote:
>> You can do that completely in user space from an initramfs.
>
> Yep, I'm aware of that. I think it would still be useful for the kernel
> to support it. Bonus - if the kernel supports it, there's a standard way
> of doing it that would propegate down to the various initramfs designs
> of the distros without having me write patches against all of them.
> Right?
I really don't see why we need this feature in-kernel as it can be
done perfectly fine
in userspace. Every non-trivial system needs an initramfs anyway these days.
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists