linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel: fix data race in put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:51:56 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mhocko@...e.cz,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ktsan@...glegroups.com,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Hans Boehm <hboehm@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: fix data race in put_pid

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 08:09:19PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 09/17, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >
> > I can update the patch description, but let me explain it here first.
> 
> Yes thanks.
> 
> > Here is the essence of what happens:
> 
> Aha, so you really meant that 2 put_pid's can race with each other,
> 
> > // thread 1
> > 1: pid->foo = 1; // foo is the first word of pid object
> > // then it does put_pid
> > 2: atomic_dec_and_test(&pid->count) // decrements count to 1 and
> > returns false so the function returns
> >
> > // thread 2
> > // executes put_pid
> > 3: atomic_load(&pid->count); // returns 1, so proceed to kmem_cache_free
> > // then kmem_cache_free does:
> > 4: *(void**)pid = head->freelist;
> > 5: head->freelist = (void*)pid;
> >
> > This can be executed as:
> >
> > 4: *(void**)pid = head->freelist;
> > 1: pid->foo = 1; // foo is the first word of pid object
> > 2: atomic_dec_and_test(&pid->count) // decrements count to 1 and
> > returns false so the function returns
> > 3: atomic_load(&pid->count); // returns 1, so proceed to kmem_cache_free
> > 5: head->freelist = (void*)pid;
> 
> Unless I am totally confused, everything is simpler. We can forget
> about the hoisting, freelist, etc.
> 
> Thread 2 can see the result of atomic_dec_and_test(), but not the
> result of "pid->foo = 1". In this case in can free the object which
> can be re-allocated _before_ STORE(pid->foo) completes. Of course,
> this would be really bad.
> 
> I need to recheck, but afaics this is not possible. This optimization
> is fine, but probably needs a comment.

For sure, this code doesn't make any sense to me.

> We rely on delayed_put_pid()
> called by RCU. And note that nobody can write to this pid after it
> is removed from the rcu-protected list.
> 
> So I think this is false alarm, but I'll try to recheck tomorrow, it
> is too late for me today.

As an alternative patch, could we not do:

  void put_pid(struct pid *pid)
  {
	struct pid_namespace *ns;

	if (!pid)
		return;

	ns = pid->numbers[pid->level].ns;
	if ((atomic_read(&pid->count) == 1) ||
	     atomic_dec_and_test(&pid->count)) {

+		smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* ctrl-dep */

		kmem_cache_free(ns->pid_cachep, pid);
		put_pid_ns(ns);
	}
  }

That would upgrade the atomic_read() path to a full READ_ONCE_CTRL(),
and thereby avoid any of the kmem_cache_free() stores from leaking out.
And its free, except on Alpha. Whereas the atomic_read_acquire() will
generate a full memory barrier on whole bunch of archs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/