linux-kernel - Re: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150918170226.GK21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:02:26 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:02:15PM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> While chasing a fix for a deadlock in netcp driver with debug options
> enabled, i bumped on another warning shown below.. Looks like I need to
> enable CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER as well to get rid of this. Have anyone seen
> this? My google search showed me some connection with this option and I
> enabled it as well and I don't see the warning anymore. Any idea if this is
> a false alarm or a real bug? Looks like I need to enable
> CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER as well. If so, I can send a patch. Either way let me
> know.

Do you have this commit applied?

commit 3302caddf10ad50710dbb7a94ccbdb3ad5bf1412
Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu Aug 20 16:13:37 2015 +0100

    ARM: entry: efficiency cleanups

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/