lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:37:34 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: lpc_ich: Separate device cells for clarity

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 5:16:06 AM
> 
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015, Aaron Sierra wrote:
> 
> > The lpc_ich_cells array gives the wrong impression about the
> > relationship between the watchdog and GPIO devices. They are
> > completely distinct devices, so this patch separates the
> > array into distinct mfd_cell structs per device.
> 
> What does this mean?  In what way are they distinct?

Lee,
This issue was discussed in late July regarding this patch Matt Fleming submitted:

    [PATCH 1/5] iTCO_wdt: Expose watchdog properties using platform data

You asked why there were multiple calls to mfd_add_devices() in the driver.
The reason that I provided was that the WDT cells can be registered even
if the GPIO cells cannot. And vice versa.

Having their cells stored in the same array added to the illusion that a
failure preparing/registering the cells of one should cause all cells to
be unregistered.

-Aaron

> > A side effect of removing the array, is that the lpc_cells enum
> > is no longer needed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c b/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> > index 8de3439..7a01d430 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> > @@ -131,24 +131,18 @@ static struct resource gpio_ich_res[] = {
> >  	},
> >  };
> >  
> > -enum lpc_cells {
> > -	LPC_WDT = 0,
> > -	LPC_GPIO,
> > +static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_wdt_cell = {
> > +	.name = "iTCO_wdt",
> > +	.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_ich_res),
> > +	.resources = wdt_ich_res,
> > +	.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_cells[] = {
> > -	[LPC_WDT] = {
> > -		.name = "iTCO_wdt",
> > -		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_ich_res),
> > -		.resources = wdt_ich_res,
> > -		.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> > -	},
> > -	[LPC_GPIO] = {
> > -		.name = "gpio_ich",
> > -		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_ich_res),
> > -		.resources = gpio_ich_res,
> > -		.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> > -	},
> > +static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_gpio_cell = {
> > +	.name = "gpio_ich",
> > +	.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_ich_res),
> > +	.resources = gpio_ich_res,
> > +	.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> >  };
> >  
> >  /* chipset related info */
> > @@ -881,7 +875,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_gpio(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	base_addr = base_addr_cfg & 0x0000ff80;
> >  	if (!base_addr) {
> >  		dev_notice(&dev->dev, "I/O space for ACPI uninitialized\n");
> > -		lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].num_resources--;
> > +		lpc_ich_gpio_cell.num_resources--;
> >  		goto gpe0_done;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -895,7 +889,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_gpio(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  		 * the platform_device subsystem doesn't see this resource
> >  		 * or it will register an invalid region.
> >  		 */
> > -		lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].num_resources--;
> > +		lpc_ich_gpio_cell.num_resources--;
> >  		acpi_conflict = true;
> >  	} else {
> >  		lpc_ich_enable_acpi_space(dev);
> > @@ -933,14 +927,14 @@ gpe0_done:
> >  	lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].use_gpio = ret;
> >  	lpc_ich_enable_gpio_space(dev);
> >  
> > -	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO]);
> > +	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_gpio_cell);
> >  	ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > -			      &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO], 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> > +			      &lpc_ich_gpio_cell, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> >  
> >  gpio_done:
> >  	if (acpi_conflict)
> >  		pr_warn("Resource conflict(s) found affecting %s\n",
> > -				lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].name);
> > +				lpc_ich_gpio_cell.name);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -984,7 +978,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].iTCO_version == 1) {
> >  		/* Don't register iomem for TCO ver 1 */
> > -		lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT].num_resources--;
> > +		lpc_ich_wdt_cell.num_resources--;
> >  	} else if (lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].iTCO_version == 2) {
> >  		pci_read_config_dword(dev, RCBABASE, &base_addr_cfg);
> >  		base_addr = base_addr_cfg & 0xffffc000;
> > @@ -1007,9 +1001,9 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  		res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_PMC_END;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT]);
> > +	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_wdt_cell);
> >  	ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > -			      &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT], 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> > +			      &lpc_ich_wdt_cell, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> >  
> >  wdt_done:
> >  	return ret;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ