[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZABp5ag+1wNAzoR-pOEYT=fKWuJ=nAQQYHv-DOdgHdUYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:59:42 +0300
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ator.liu.se>
Cc: "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Crt Mori <cmo@...exis.com>,
Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: resistance: Document that resistance can be output
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Peter Rosin <peda@...ator.liu.se> wrote:
> On 2015-09-22 14:48, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Peter Rosin <peda@...ator.liu.se> wrote:
>>> From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
>>> index 9398484196c4..2eea468f704d 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
>>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
>>> @@ -1475,6 +1475,8 @@ Description:
>>>
>>> What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_resistance_raw
>>> What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_resistanceX_raw
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/out_resistance_raw
>>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/out_resistanceX_raw
>>> KernelVersion: 4.3
>>> Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>>> Description:
>>
>> One more thing. The description for this sections says:
>>
>> » » Raw (unscaled no offset etc.) resistance reading that
>> can be processed
>> » » into an ohm value.
>>
>> I'm not sure this still holds for out_resistanceX_raw. We have two options here:
>
> I figured it did hold, since you effectively select what reading the
> resistance inside the potentiometer should have. If it's really
> important I can of course make another spin, but is this somthing
> that is likely to be misunderstood?
Now, with your explanation it makes more sense. We can leave it like
that.
thanks,
Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists