[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrV-Y90=wXOuXGauT0BQbyHdkpfLmi1nF5Y2G=Vhx3GzuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:03:25 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] x86/mm/pat: Don't free PGD entries on memory unmap
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> This complicates PGD management, so don't do this. We can keep the
>> PGD mapped and the PUD table all clear - it's only a single 4K page
>> per 512 GB of memory mapped.
>
> I'm ok with this just from a "it removes code" standpoint. That said,
> some of the other patches here make me go "hmm". I'll answer them
> separately.
>
If we want to get rid of vmalloc faults, then this patch makes it much
more obvious that it can be done without hurting performance.
> Linus
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists