lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150923043910.GB24668@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net>
Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:39:10 -0700
From:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
To:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
CC:	<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sort dt_params array in the same order as
 pin_config_param

On Sun 20 Sep 09:26 PDT 2015, Masahiro Yamada wrote:

> Sort this array in the same order as enum pin_config_param and
> conf_items array for consistency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c
> index e63ad9f..f0bc8bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c
> @@ -166,11 +166,11 @@ static const struct pinconf_generic_params dt_params[] = {
>  	{ "input-schmitt-disable", PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE, 0 },
>  	{ "input-debounce", PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_DEBOUNCE, 0 },
>  	{ "power-source", PIN_CONFIG_POWER_SOURCE, 0 },
> +	{ "slew-rate", PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE, 0 },
>  	{ "low-power-enable", PIN_CONFIG_LOW_POWER_MODE, 1 },
>  	{ "low-power-disable", PIN_CONFIG_LOW_POWER_MODE, 0 },
>  	{ "output-low", PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT, 0, },
>  	{ "output-high", PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT, 1, },
> -	{ "slew-rate", PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE, 0},

I would like to see these alphabetically sorted instead and looking at
most of the entries that's already the case.

The order of the lists in this file the order doesn't matter, so that's
easy. There's some potential implications of renumbering the enum, but I
think it's worth keeping them sorted as well.

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ