[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56026DBE.3090603@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:15:42 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"sboyd@...eaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken big-endian 64bit platforms
using 'global_lock'
On 15/09/15 09:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> global_lock is defined as an unsigned long and accessing only its lower
> 32 bits from sysfs is incorrect, as we need to consider other 32 bits
> for big endian 64 bit systems.
>
> Fix that by making global_lock an u32 instead.
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.1+
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
> ---
> Its marked just for # v4.1+, because arm64 has the first 64 big-endian
> platform with ACPI. And ACPI support for that is mainlined recently
> only (Arnd Bergmann).
>
Just to clarify, we don't support big-endian with ACPI on ARM64.
We mandate use of EFI for ACPI on ARM64 and EFI spec mandates only
little endian.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists