[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1443060467.21433.3.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:07:47 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: "long.wanglong" <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
Cc: shuahkh@....samsung.com, sam.bobroff@....ibm.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@...ba.or,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
anton@...ba.org, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
john.stultz@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wanglong@...qinren.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
peifeiyue@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest: using built-in rule when delete file
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 10:05 +0800, long.wanglong wrote:
> On 2015/9/24 9:46, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 09:40 +0000, Wang Long wrote:
> >> Use make's built-in rules to when delete a file
> >> or delete files.
> >
> > It's not a built-in rule, it's a variable.
>
> Sorry,I did not describe clearly. It is a variable used as
> name of program in built-in rules.
>
> > Personally I think using rm directly is clearer, but I guess this is fine. Do
> > you actually want to override $RM ?
>
> So far, I do not want to override $(RM). But I found that some test's Makefile
> using *$(RM)* while the other's using *rm -f*, I think it is better to use one
> of them in all unit tests.
>
> Do you think which one is better?
I prefer just using rm -f, because it's less magic, everyone knows what it does.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists