[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56035A71.9040301@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:05:37 +0800
From: "long.wanglong" <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
CC: <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, <sam.bobroff@....ibm.com>,
<aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <paulus@...ba.or>,
<khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<anton@...ba.org>, <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<john.stultz@...aro.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<wanglong@...qinren.net>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<peifeiyue@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest: using built-in rule when delete file
On 2015/9/24 9:46, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 09:40 +0000, Wang Long wrote:
>> Use make's built-in rules to when delete a file
>> or delete files.
>
> It's not a built-in rule, it's a variable.
Sorry,I did not describe clearly. It is a variable used as
name of program in built-in rules.
>
> Personally I think using rm directly is clearer, but I guess this is fine. Do
> you actually want to override $RM ?
>
So far, I do not want to override $(RM). But I found that some test's Makefile
using *$(RM)* while the other's using *rm -f*, I think it is better to use one
of them in all unit tests.
Do you think which one is better?
Best Regards
Wang Long
> cheers
>
>
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists