[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150925085002.GA17075@blaptop>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 17:50:02 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 05:47:13PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:17:54AM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > I already said questions, opinion and concerns but anything is not clear
> > > until now. Only clear thing I could hear is just "compaction stats are
> > > better" which is not enough for me. Sorry.
> > >
> > > 1) https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/15/33
> > > 2) https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/21/2
> >
> > Could you please stop perverting the facts, I did answer to that:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/21/753.
> >
> > Apart from that, an opinion is not necessarily something I would
> > answer. Concerns about zsmalloc are not in the scope of this patch's
> > discussion. If you have any concerns regarding this particular patch,
> > please let us know.
>
> Yes, I don't want to interrupt zbud thing which is Seth should maintain
> and I respect his decision but the reason I nacked is you said this patch
> aims for supporing zbud into zsmalloc for determinism.
zram
Sorry for the typo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists