[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150925095702.GA1049@swordfish>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 18:57:02 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zbud: allow up to PAGE_SIZE allocations
On (09/25/15 10:27), Vitaly Wool wrote:
> > Have you seen those symptoms before? How did you come up to a conclusion
> > that zram->zbud will do the trick?
>
> I have data from various tests (partially described here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/17/244) and once again, I'll post a reply
yeah, I guess I'm just not so bright to quickly understand what is wrong
with zsmalloc from those numbers.
> to https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/15/33 with more detailed test
> description and explanation why zsmalloc is not the right choice for
> me.
great, thanks.
> > If those symptoms are some sort of a recent addition, then does it help
> > when you disable zsmalloc compaction?
>
> No it doesn't. OTOH enabled zsmalloc compaction doesn't seem to have a
> substantial effect either.
hm. ok, that was my quick guess.
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists