linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.1 156/159] inet: fix possible request socket leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:56:42 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 156/159] inet: fix possible request socket leak

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 3257d8b12f954c462d29de6201664a846328a522 ]

In commit b357a364c57c9 ("inet: fix possible panic in
reqsk_queue_unlink()"), I missed fact that tcp_check_req()
can return the listener socket in one case, and that we must
release the request socket refcount or we leak it.

Tested:

 Following packetdrill test template shows the issue

0     socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0    setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
+0    bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0    listen(3, 1) = 0

+0    < S 0:0(0) win 2920 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop>
+0    > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
+.002 < . 1:1(0) ack 21 win 2920
+0    > R 21:21(0)

Fixes: b357a364c57c9 ("inet: fix possible panic in reqsk_queue_unlink()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c |    2 +-
 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ static struct sock *tcp_v4_hnd_req(struc
 	req = inet_csk_search_req(sk, th->source, iph->saddr, iph->daddr);
 	if (req) {
 		nsk = tcp_check_req(sk, skb, req, false);
-		if (!nsk)
+		if (!nsk || nsk == sk)
 			reqsk_put(req);
 		return nsk;
 	}
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static struct sock *tcp_v6_hnd_req(struc
 				   &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr, tcp_v6_iif(skb));
 	if (req) {
 		nsk = tcp_check_req(sk, skb, req, false);
-		if (!nsk)
+		if (!nsk || nsk == sk)
 			reqsk_put(req);
 		return nsk;
 	}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/