linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.1 157/159] inet: fix races with reqsk timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150926205322.306609629@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:56:43 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 157/159] inet: fix races with reqsk timers

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 2235f2ac75fd2501c251b0b699a9632e80239a6d ]

reqsk_queue_destroy() and reqsk_queue_unlink() should use
del_timer_sync() instead of del_timer() before calling reqsk_put(),
otherwise we could free a req still used by another cpu.

But before doing so, reqsk_queue_destroy() must release syn_wait_lock
spinlock or risk a dead lock, as reqsk_timer_handler() might
need to take this same spinlock from reqsk_queue_unlink() (called from
inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop())

Fixes: fa76ce7328b2 ("inet: get rid of central tcp/dccp listener timer")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/core/request_sock.c         |    8 +++++++-
 net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/request_sock.c
+++ b/net/core/request_sock.c
@@ -103,10 +103,16 @@ void reqsk_queue_destroy(struct request_
 			spin_lock_bh(&queue->syn_wait_lock);
 			while ((req = lopt->syn_table[i]) != NULL) {
 				lopt->syn_table[i] = req->dl_next;
+				/* Because of following del_timer_sync(),
+				 * we must release the spinlock here
+				 * or risk a dead lock.
+				 */
+				spin_unlock_bh(&queue->syn_wait_lock);
 				atomic_inc(&lopt->qlen_dec);
-				if (del_timer(&req->rsk_timer))
+				if (del_timer_sync(&req->rsk_timer))
 					reqsk_put(req);
 				reqsk_put(req);
+				spin_lock_bh(&queue->syn_wait_lock);
 			}
 			spin_unlock_bh(&queue->syn_wait_lock);
 		}
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static bool reqsk_queue_unlink(struct re
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&queue->syn_wait_lock);
-	if (del_timer(&req->rsk_timer))
+	if (del_timer_sync(&req->rsk_timer))
 		reqsk_put(req);
 	return found;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/