linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: rtl8712: rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c Move constant to right side of the comparision

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:48:28 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc:	Punit Vara <punitvara@...il.com>,
	florian.c.schilhabel@...glemail.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dogukan.ergun@...il.com, stillcompiling@...il.com,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: rtl8712: rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c Move constant to
 right side of the comparision

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:45:46PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 09/26/2015 11:49 AM, Punit Vara wrote:
> >This patch is to the rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c that fixes up following
> >warning reported by checkpatch.pl :
> >
> >- Comparisons should place the constant on the right side of the test
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Punit Vara <punitvara@...il.com>
> 
> This warning is crap. WTF difference does it make???? The compiler
> does not care, and any reader with any piece of a brain is not going
> to be confused!
> 
> This patch and all others like it are just meaningless source churning!
> 
> This author has made such a royal mess of his patches that I
> recommend that ALL of them be dropped. In addition, we should
> continue to drop his changes until he learns how to use git to
> generate N/M patches, and until he reads the documentation on patch
> submission.
Excuse me for my ignorance, but I still can not see what was wrong with
his patch. checkpatch is giving warning and he has fixed it. As far as
sending in series is concerned, he is a newbie and after telling him how
to generate patches in series he has learnt that. I have already told
him that his patches might be dropped as they are not in series and he
is ready to resend in series as soon as Greg confirms that they are
dropped. And as long as the driver is in staging there will be source
churning, isn't it?
If i remember correctly I was told that for a driver to be moved out of
staging the primary thing is that all checkpatch warnings needs to fixed.
So if this driver has to move out of staging someday then these warnings
also has to be fixed by someone.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/