[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874miekcnd.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:26:46 +0200
From:	Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>
To:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:	Songjun Wu <songjun.wu@...el.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
	nicolas.ferre@...el.com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	broonie@...nel.org, kbuild-all@...org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: atmel-classd: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings
>>>>> "kbuild" == kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> writes:
 > sound/soc/atmel/atmel-classd.c:578:5-11: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR, PTR_ERR on line 579
 >  PTR_ERR should access the value just tested by IS_ERR
 > Semantic patch information:
 >  There can be false positives in the patch case, where it is the call
 >  IS_ERR that is wrong.
 > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/tests/odd_ptr_err.cocci
 > CC: Songjun Wu <songjun.wu@...el.com>
 > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
 > ---
 >  atmel-classd.c |    2 +-
 >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 > --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel-classd.c
 > +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel-classd.c
 > @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static int atmel_classd_probe(struct pla
 
 dd-> gclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "gclk");
 >  	if (IS_ERR(dd->aclk)) {
 > -		ret = PTR_ERR(dd->gclk);
 > +		ret = PTR_ERR(dd->aclk);
It looks like it is the other way around. It should test
IS_ERR(dd->gclk) instead.
-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
