[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1509281512510.3148@hadrien>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:13:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v2] coccinelle: assign signed result to unsigned
variable
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I guess parallelism would be helpful?
> > You could try the following options:
> >
> > -j n --chunksize 10 --recursive-includes --include-headers-for-types
> >
> > where n is the number of cores that you want to use.
>
> Has the make target "coccicheck" direct support for such special parameters?
>
>
> > Parsed header files will be cached within chunks.
>
> Can the Coccinelle software work together with a kind of "precompiled
> header database"?
There is an option --use-cache, which caches the compiled code on the
disk. But I have not found the effects to be very satisfactory. It is
still necessary to read in the serialized code.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists