linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <39030379.kalO2V72FV@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:53:52 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure

On Monday, September 28, 2015 01:59:19 PM Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On 26/09/15 00:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> >> Marc Zyngier (5):
> >>   acpi: Add basic device probing infrastructure
> >>   irqchip/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based irqchips
> >>   irqchip/gic: Convert the GIC driver to ACPI probing
> >>   clocksource/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based
> >>     clocksources
> >>   clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Convert to ACPI probing
> > 
> > I'm generally fine with this (modulo a couple of super-minor nits in the
> > first patch), but it needs ACKs from Thomas for the irqchip-related and
> > clocksource-related patches.
> 
> Sure. I've now addressed your comments, and I'll post the updated series
> later today.
> 
> > Plus [3/5] needs to be rebased on top of the Al's patches removing BAD_MADT_ENTRY
> > (currently in my bleeding-edge branch).
> 
> Al's patches were there on Friday, but vanished over the weekend. Do you
> have another (stable?) branch with these patches in (assuming they are
> still aimed at 4.4)?

The Al's patches are gone for now, because they introduced a 0-day testing
regression.

I guess this means I can apply your patches first and ask Al to rebase his
next version on them.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/