linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56094589.504@arm.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:50:01 +0100
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure

On 28/09/15 14:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, September 28, 2015 01:59:19 PM Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> On 26/09/15 00:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>>> Marc Zyngier (5):
>>>>   acpi: Add basic device probing infrastructure
>>>>   irqchip/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based irqchips
>>>>   irqchip/gic: Convert the GIC driver to ACPI probing
>>>>   clocksource/acpi: Add probing infrastructure for ACPI-based
>>>>     clocksources
>>>>   clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Convert to ACPI probing
>>>
>>> I'm generally fine with this (modulo a couple of super-minor nits in the
>>> first patch), but it needs ACKs from Thomas for the irqchip-related and
>>> clocksource-related patches.
>>
>> Sure. I've now addressed your comments, and I'll post the updated series
>> later today.
>>
>>> Plus [3/5] needs to be rebased on top of the Al's patches removing BAD_MADT_ENTRY
>>> (currently in my bleeding-edge branch).
>>
>> Al's patches were there on Friday, but vanished over the weekend. Do you
>> have another (stable?) branch with these patches in (assuming they are
>> still aimed at 4.4)?
> 
> The Al's patches are gone for now, because they introduced a 0-day testing
> regression.
> 
> I guess this means I can apply your patches first and ask Al to rebase his
> next version on them.

OK. I'll rebase them on the current bleeding-edge, and post that.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/