[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3218771.zBxT0jYLDs@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:37:09 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nios2: Add architectural support for PCIe
On Tuesday 29 September 2015 11:12:24 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> >
> > I think that would be good, yes. We probably picked defaults for the
> > asm-generic version that are enough to build with CONFIG_PCI disabled,
> > but there are useful defaults for the other case as well.
> >
> > Most architectures that use the file don't support PCI, so you can just
> > add stuff inside of #ifdef CONFIG_PCI. For the remaining 13 architectures
> > (git grep -l generic/pci.h | wc), see whether there are conflicts first.
> > The normal way would be to have the arch specific definition come before
> > the #include, and then do something like
> >
> > #ifndef pci_proc_domain
> > #define pci_proc_domain pci_proc_domain
> > static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC
> > return pci_domain_nr(bus);
> > #else
> > return 1;
> > }
> > #endif
>
> Okay, will try add them to asm-generic.
Thanks
> Do you prefer to send it as separate patch or can be part of this patchset?
I prefer the patches to be part of this series and merged through together
with them.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists