[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150929135538.GD7572@8bytes.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:55:38 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Adjsut the return value of the
parse_ioapics_under_ir
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:26:09PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> index 37b93f5..0f441b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static int __init intel_prepare_irq_remapping(void)
> if (!dmar_ir_support())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (parse_ioapics_under_ir() != 1) {
> + if (!parse_ioapics_under_ir()) {
> pr_info("Not enabling interrupt remapping\n");
> goto error;
> }
> @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ static int __init parse_ioapics_under_ir(void)
> }
>
> if (!ir_supported)
> - return 0;
> + return -1;
>
> for (ioapic_idx = 0; ioapic_idx < nr_ioapics; ioapic_idx++) {
> int ioapic_id = mpc_ioapic_id(ioapic_idx);
> @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static int __init parse_ioapics_under_ir(void)
> }
> }
>
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
Looks good, but -ENODEV is probably a better return value than -1.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists