[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <560AA56C.4020209@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:51:24 +0900
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@....com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] fs/nilfs2: remove unnecessary new_valid_dev check
On 2015/09/28 23:33, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
> needed, remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@....com>
Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
> ---
> fs/nilfs2/namei.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/namei.c b/fs/nilfs2/namei.c
> index 37dd6b0..c9a1a49 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/namei.c
> @@ -120,9 +120,6 @@ nilfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode, dev_t rdev)
> struct nilfs_transaction_info ti;
> int err;
>
> - if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> err = nilfs_transaction_begin(dir->i_sb, &ti, 1);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists