[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150930182405.GA15238@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:24:05 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Kyle Walker <kwalker@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Kozina <skozina@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong
fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process()
The fatal_signal_pending() was added to suppress unnecessary "sharing
same memory" message, but it can't 100% help anyway because it can be
false-negative; SIGKILL can be already dequeued.
And worse, it can be false-positive due to exec or coredump. exec is
mostly fine, but coredump is not. It is possible that the group leader
has the pending SIGKILL because its sub-thread originated the coredump,
in this case we must not skip this process.
We could probably add the additional ->group_exit_task check but this
pach just removes the wrong check along with pr_info().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 4766e25..b6b8c78 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -588,11 +588,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
continue;
- if (fatal_signal_pending(p))
- continue;
- pr_info("Kill process %d (%s) sharing same memory\n",
- task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists