[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150930182408.GA15247@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:24:08 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Kyle Walker <kwalker@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Kozina <skozina@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm v2 2/3] mm/oom_kill: cleanup the "kill sharing same
memory" loop
Purely cosmetic, but the complex "if" condition looks annoying to me.
Especially because it is not consistent with OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN check
which adds another if/continue.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index b6b8c78..c189ee5 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -583,14 +583,18 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
* pending fatal signal.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process(p)
- if (p->mm == mm && !same_thread_group(p, victim) &&
- !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
- if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
- continue;
+ for_each_process(p) {
+ if (p->mm != mm)
+ continue;
+ if (same_thread_group(p, victim))
+ continue;
+ if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ continue;
+ if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
+ continue;
- do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
- }
+ do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
mmput(mm);
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists