[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150930111512.GC2903@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:15:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] sched: Add preempt_count invariant check
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 05:38:10AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:10:47 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > Ingo requested I keep my debug check for the preempt_count invariant.
> >
> > Requested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -2514,6 +2514,10 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(str
> > *
> > * Also, see FORK_PREEMPT_COUNT.
> > */
> > + if (unlikely(WARN_ONCE(preempt_count() != 2*PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET,
>
> Nuke the "unlikely" it's redundant with the WARN_ONCE().
Ah, indeed. *poof*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists