[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150930.084039.1788742148434227487.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, jason@...edaemon.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, andrew@...n.ch,
sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, alior@...vell.com,
tawfik@...vell.com, nadavh@...vell.com,
ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, w@....eu,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] net: mvneta: Switch to per-CPU irq and make
rxq_def useful
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:56:06 +0200 (CEST)
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
>> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 18:09:31 +0200
>>
>> > As stated in the first version: "this patchset reworks the Marvell
>> > neta driver in order to really support its per-CPU interrupts, instead
>> > of faking them as SPI, and allow the use of any RX queue instead of
>> > the hardcoded RX queue 0 that we have currently."
>>
>> Series applied, thanks.
>
> You could have had the courtesy to wait for an ack for the core irq
> parts at least....
Sorry, my impression was that those parts were already discussed and
agreed upon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists