linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] net: mvneta: Switch to per-CPU irq and make rxq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509301938130.4500@nanos>
Date:	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:39:26 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, jason@...edaemon.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, andrew@...n.ch,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, alior@...vell.com,
	tawfik@...vell.com, nadavh@...vell.com,
	ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com,
	maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
	boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, w@....eu,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] net: mvneta: Switch to per-CPU irq and make
 rxq_def useful

On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:56:06 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 18:09:31 +0200
> >> 
> >> > As stated in the first version: "this patchset reworks the Marvell
> >> > neta driver in order to really support its per-CPU interrupts, instead
> >> > of faking them as SPI, and allow the use of any RX queue instead of
> >> > the hardcoded RX queue 0 that we have currently."
> >> 
> >> Series applied, thanks.
> > 
> > You could have had the courtesy to wait for an ack for the core irq
> > parts at least....
> 
> Sorry, my impression was that those parts were already discussed and
> agreed upon.

No problem. I would have preferred to merge them to a separate branch
which you could have pulled so we don't end up with conflicts on
further changes in that area. But it's ok as it is. The patches are
good to go.

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/