linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma: pxa_dma: fix the no-requestor case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87fv1verom.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date:	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:35:21 +0200
From:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma: pxa_dma: fix the no-requestor case

Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 07:17:45PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> A very small number of devices don't use the flow control offered by
>> requestor lines. In these specific cases, the pxa dma driver should be
>> aware of that and not try to use a requestor line.
>
> And these fail for me, what were these sent against?
v4.2. My fault, in v4.2-rc1 the patch 0e95fb9ceb82 ("dmaengine: pxa_dma: don't
use config direction parameter") impact this one.

> Please rebase and resend
Of course, I'm on it.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/