[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509301941370.4500@nanos>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:43:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: Reduce MAX_LOCAL_APIC and MAX_IO_APICS
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 05:11 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >>
> >> +config MAX_LAPIC_ID
> >> + int "Maximum APIC ID"
> >> + range 8 32768
> >> + default "8"
> >> + ---help---
> >> + Use this option to set maximum allowed Local APIC ID higher than
> >> + maximum number of CPUs. This may be necessary for machines
> >> + with large number of processor sockets and non-contiguous
> >> + LAPIC numbering.
> >> + This setting will be automatically rounded up, if necessary.
> >
> > This is wrong. If you would limit the APIC IDs then you really break
> > stuff. You can only limit the number of APICs.
>
> This CONFIG setting allows to _increase_ max APIC ID.
NO. This is crap. I don't want to tweak a gazillion of knobs just to
build a kernel with CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8. Really not.
If you really want to make that space saving, then make it a runtime
allocation.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists