[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-eb56db54326f910348defbee2803ec0675a664b2@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:11:19 -0700
From: tip-bot for Sukadev Bhattiprolu <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jolsa@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, acme@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf tools:
Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
Commit-ID: eb56db54326f910348defbee2803ec0675a664b2
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/eb56db54326f910348defbee2803ec0675a664b2
Author: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 18:34:27 -0300
perf tools: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
The perf_regs.c file does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS
is false. So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get
picked up.
Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
function.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Dominik Dingel <dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150930182836.GA27858@us.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/Build | 2 +-
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 2 ++
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index 4bc7a9a..9217119 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ libperf-y += levenshtein.o
libperf-y += llvm-utils.o
libperf-y += parse-options.o
libperf-y += parse-events.o
+libperf-y += perf_regs.o
libperf-y += path.o
libperf-y += rbtree.o
libperf-y += bitmap.o
@@ -104,7 +105,6 @@ libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBBABELTRACE) += data-convert-bt.o
libperf-y += scripting-engines/
-libperf-$(CONFIG_PERF_REGS) += perf_regs.o
libperf-$(CONFIG_ZLIB) += zlib.o
libperf-$(CONFIG_LZMA) += lzma.o
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
index 885e8ac..6b8eb13 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ const struct sample_reg __weak sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG_END
};
+#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
{
int i, idx = 0;
@@ -29,3 +30,4 @@ out:
*valp = regs->cache_regs[id];
return 0;
}
+#endif
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
index 2984dcc..679d6e4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#define __PERF_REGS_H
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
struct regs_dump;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists