[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1444178798.6794.1.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 11:46:38 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to
sample_reg_masks
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 16:45 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > > From e29aeeee7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
> > >
> > > perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false.
> > > So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up.
> > >
> > > Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
> > > error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
> > > in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
> > > function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks, applied.
Is this going to Linus' tree any time soon?
I have folks pinging me to say that perf is broken on powerpc.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists