linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 Oct 2015 17:06:06 +0200
From:	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
	linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding

On 09/30/2015 07:43 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 30/09/15 01:21, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> In order to cleanly unbind the dsa core, either as a module removal,
>> or a platform device unbind, switch the allocation the their devm_
>> counterparts and complete the destroy functions.
>>
>> The last patch is an experimental way to exit the probe when no
>> switch is found in the discover process.
>>
>> The patches are based on the current net-next.
> 
> I looked at the patches and they bring DSA in a better direction. For
> future submissions, could you CC people who recently worked on DSA, like
> Andrew Lunn, Guenter Roeck, Vivien Didelot and myself? We can typically
> give your patches a try fairly quickly.
> 
> In case you are seriously considering making DSA a loadable module,
> there were an earlier attempt here:
> 
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/345803
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>>
>> Neil Armstrong (3):
>>   net: dsa: Use devm_ prefixed allocations
>>   net: dsa: complete dsa_switch_destroy calls
>>   net: dsa: exit probe if no switch were found
>>
>>  net/dsa/dsa.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> 
Hi All,

Thanks for the tests and reviews.

My first intent is to make dynamic unbind/bind reliable, the reliable loadable module support
is a more complex target, but starting with unbind is a simpler start.

Should I re-post with the missing people, the Tested-by & without the RFC tag ?

Regards,
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/